BENCH
The bench cracked as it snapped under his bottom. Legs flew crooked like barbecue wings as he sunk with a dignified smirk to the patio slab. It drew mirth from those with the luckier disposition to be on seats of sound wood, plastic or metal.
Surely with some sort of element of poor luck, another bench, which looked passably sound except for rotten members, cracked and snapped beneath him all over again, eliciting complicitous respect from slightly less personally-acquainted company.
Benches one and two ceased being fit for purpose the second had been assembled several summers before. In itself it carried no memory, of itself it was naught but moulded iron and slats of timber that he hadn’t even treated once. Unfortunately this left him unable to blame the company who had produced “such a woefully inadequate piece of garden furniture.”
His father imbued him with the belief that a taste for accusing oneself bitterly of woeful inadequacy was as good a sport as pitilessly abusing anyone who caused the iniquity to occur. Then, deftly, once he had abused whoever got in the way, he could blame himself all over again for being abusive, which abuse was doubly inflicted because a ‘harm done to another is a harm done to the self.’
Benches are funny – garden benches, benches with tables, benches on trains, buses, the front benches, back benches, church benches, work benches. Then the scourge of strategic language: benchmark. Begs the question rather, ‘how long is a piece of string?’
Not forgetting the school-bench, how lovely: those weirdly constructed wooden slabs as long as you like and just the size of a small child. Picking them up as a group and moving them back to the side of the hall, picking them up again and making lines for my friends to sit with crossed arms and listen to their proud teachers bestowing gifts on supplicants and neophytes.
A benchmark? A mark on a bench where a thing being made is the same as something the craftsman made before, just the first template really. So when I benchmark this public service, I’m measuring it, trying to see if it is close or not to the ideal or the best I can get: value for money that I can measure and make judgements about. So I can report the findings to other craftspeople with all their benchmarks too.
Strange, the similarity linguistically between ‘bench’ and ‘mensch’, seemingly a causal or semantic link… There might appear it seems to be a little jiggery-pokery going on in the ‘nahe von’ bench and person. Must talk of my all time respect and concurrence with Martin Heidegger.
He speaks beautifully of linguistic and ontological ‘neighbourhoods.’ Best though is the Clearing placed in Being by him resulting from an Ecstasy of past, present and future, with the implication of going deeper and deeper into it, unpeeling each subsequent scale from our inner eye.
Could it simply be that I sit with my being as if I were on a bench, or, crucially, I sit on a seat purpose made for more that one person, for a community, for a Throng? I share this seat and I share this Being, I therefore share the Clearing in Being. Perhaps, the clearing only appears when I share being with others??
As far as I’m concerned, Heidegger may be the first to have bottled what some call “the Holy Spirit.” Jesus said: “Where two or more are gathered in my name, there shall I be also.” Was Jesus preaching to us about the Clearing of Heidegger? The place, after all where we must sit on benches, not chairs to perceive ‘it.’ Did Heidegger give people the tool to marry faith and science, logic and myth? Are we all speaking the same language, only with a different accent?
My bum is on the bench, her bum is on the bench, our seat is the same, we are side by side on the same basis and because we are side by side, other bench-sitters are side by side on the same basis. We support and maintain thought, understanding, love and pain in our focus that only works if we share our vision. I see I see I see.
Z